
Thank you for registering
October 2026
Cost teams can ask more questions about a product than they have time to answer. How the Model Context Protocol shortens the path from question to answer, extends analysis from the top parts to the whole BoM, and moves the team faster from answer to decision.
Looking to subscribe to our newsletter? Click here.

A cost engineering team can ask more questions about a product than it can answer. Which assemblies share an upstream supplier? How much aluminum sits in the whole build? Which three changes would take the most cost out of this platform? A well-built product model can answer each one, because the material, process, origin and price of every node are already in it.
What limits the team is getting to the answer. A Bill of Material (BoM) commonly carries hundreds of line items and thousands of parameters, and a cross-cutting question means filtering, exporting and stitching that structure together by hand. So teams ask these questions about the few parts someone had time to study. Every other line keeps last year's assumptions, and the savings in those lines go unexamined.
The Model Context Protocol (MCP) is an open standard for connecting AI assistants to external systems. Anthropic introduced it in November 2024 so that an assistant could call a platform's capabilities as tools, in place of a custom integration for every pairing of model and system.
For a cost team, that means the AI assistant the company has already approved can query a product model directly. A plain-language question becomes a set of tool calls against the model. The answer comes back with its basis attached, in the same conversation where the next question gets asked.
The first gain is the time between asking and knowing. A design engineer weighing a switch from machined aluminum to a die casting can ask what the change does to unit cost while the selection is still open, and get an answer from the model instead of a ticket in the cost team's queue. A buyer preparing for a supplier call can pull a should-cost position on the line in question that morning.
Most of the traversal behind those answers was already possible. MCP moves it into the conversation where the decision is being made.
The second gain is coverage. When every cross-cutting question took hours, teams rationed them to the highest-spend parts. An agent connected through MCP can run the same question across every line of every model in the workspace, then sort the results.
"Which lines in this program are priced well above should-cost?" is now a reasonable question to put to an agent that can read the whole program. It was rarely a reasonable question to put to an analyst with a spreadsheet and a week. The parts that never made the top-20 list are often where the unexamined cost sits.
The third gain comes after the answer. An agent can rank cost-reduction levers by impact, quantify a supplier switch across process, geography and material, check whether the team has already explored the same direction, and assemble the result into a scenario ready for review.
The engineer still decides which lever to pull and supplies the expert judgment the model cannot infer, such as a qualification constraint or a supplier relationship. What changes is how much of the groundwork is done before that judgment is applied. The work shifts from producing the number to deciding what the company does with it, a shift covered in from cost analyst to cost strategist.
A cost engineer preparing for a program review opens the company's approved assistant and asks one question: "Across the housings in this program, where are we furthest above should-cost, and what would close the gap?"
The agent works through it in four steps:
The engineer rules out the supplier change because the part is mid-qualification and a switch would restart it. She asks the agent to model the process change on a second housing instead. The agent proposes the edit, previews what moves in cost, and waits for approval. She applies it, and the result is saved as a scenario her buyer can take into the next supplier call.
Each step was possible before. What changed is that the whole program got examined in one sitting, and the engineer spent her time on the two calls only she could make: which lever to rule out and which to pursue.
Faster answers are only useful if the team can defend them. Three controls keep MCP access from turning into black-box output:
The MCP connection announcement covers these controls in more detail.
An agent can only cover as much of the BoM as the models behind it cover, so the speed of building the model matters as much as the speed of querying it. Muir AI builds a working should-cost model from a BoM in about five minutes instead of a quarter, using BoM comprehension to map each line to materials and processes and a product twin to fill gaps where supplier data or design specs are incomplete. Its MCP connection, now in beta for select customers, puts those models inside the enterprise assistant the team already uses, so the questions that used to wait for a free week get asked while the design or the negotiation is still open. More on the modeling side is on the should-cost modeling page.
Want to see how far one conversation gets on your own product? Book a demo and bring a raw BoM. We will build the model and run the questions your team has not had time to ask.
MCP, the Model Context Protocol, is an open standard that lets an AI assistant call external platforms as tools. In cost engineering it lets an approved enterprise assistant query product and should-cost models directly, so a plain-language question returns an answer with its basis attached.
In three places. It shortens the time from question to answer, because the assistant queries the model directly. It widens coverage, because an agent can run the same question across every BoM line instead of only the top parts. It shortens the path from answer to decision, because the agent can rank cost levers and assemble a scenario for review.
It should not. In a well-governed connection every change follows a propose, validate, preview and apply sequence, and nothing is committed until a user explicitly approves it. Every value keeps its provenance, so each change can be traced to who made it and why.
The Muir MCP connection is in beta and available to select Muir customers. It works with MCP-compatible assistants, including Claude, and inherits the access controls already set in the Muir workspace.